GEM4D on-line tutorials
The second on-line tutorial occurred on Tuesday 1 September and is available under videos or from here - thanks to the attendees for a great discussion! The following topics were covered in the times slots indicated:
Drillholes: 0.00 to 7:10
Filter and iso-surface composite data: 7:10 to 10:35
Drillholes discussion: 10:35 to 16:35
ERF calculations: 16:40 to 22:57
HR calculations: 23:00 to 34:30
Discussion HR: 34:30 to 36:55
Open pit reconciliation: 36:55 to 48:15
Clippings: 48:15 to 50:55
Splitting meshes: 51:20 to 53:47
Mesh data to CSV: 53:47 to 54:50
If you visit the videos directly on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=UUTgU1WB9DSyEOdsK1o2RCCQ), the topics are listed below the videos, with hyperlinks that directly jump to the correct time window.
The next on-line GoToMeeting session:
Perth time (UTC+8): Tuesday 10 November @ 9 pm in Perth
Which would be earlier on Tuesday 10 November for most other countries (6 am in California, 7 am in Colorado, 11 am in Sao Paulo, 1 pm in Accra, 2 pm in London, 5 pm in Moscow).
Use https://www.thetimezoneconverter.com to work out your local time
GoToMeeting link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/858234717
Duration: ~60 minutes
The following topics will be discussed:
Simplifying meshes for numerical modelling and other uses: ~15 minutes.
Structural geology (mapping and building warped surfaces): ~15 minutes.
Answer any other questions: ~30 minutes
If you have specific questions that you would like me to cover, please mail them to mail@basrock.net or ask questions during the session.
Below is a warped surface created from Mapping-data. Marker-data could also be used, but provide a different outcome as orientation information is not available. The warped surface creation is automated, and creating these surfaces from a few Markers/Mapping data points take seconds. Never update a mesh, but always update the data points, as creating these meshes are trivial and quick - we will discuss further during the on-line session.
Hope to meet you on the call, keep well.
Considering finding a comfortable rhythm in home baking, I would want to understand a few concrete details before deciding what matters most. Changing one detail at a time makes it easier to understand why a recipe behaves differently. That is why the connection between Astonparishbakery and home baking ideas makes me want to think through an example. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What would you write down after a first attempt before trying the recipe again?
I keep coming back to the everyday side of exploring visual ideas through observation, where a simple detail can lead to a wider question. A small choice of colour or viewpoint can change the feeling of an image. It is the kind of question I would keep in mind when thinking about Asmallview and creative visual expression. A simple comparison would help me picture the differences without rushing towards a fixed answer. How would you describe that change to someone who has not seen the work?
Thinking about building confidence through regular sporting activity, I find the smaller practical questions more interesting than a quick conclusion. A routine is easier to maintain when the next session feels challenging but achievable. I would connect Andybaddeley with recreational sport practice through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. The smaller details are what I would want to return to, especially when an explanation feels too broad. How do you recognise progress without comparing every attempt with someone else's result?
A discussion of noticing the choices behind live performance seems more useful when it connects an idea with something easy to picture. A pause or a change in lighting can alter the way an audience understands a moment. I would connect Agent160theatre with live performance appreciation through an ordinary example rather than a broad claim. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What would you pay attention to when comparing two performances of the same scene?
For me, exploring everyday food and cooking traditions becomes more engaging when there is room for questions as well as explanations. An ingredient can carry a story about the place or family that uses it. That thought gives me a starting point for exploring food and cooking ideas in connection with Adlardsinthecountry. The smaller details are what I would want to return to, especially when an explanation feels too broad. Which part of a recipe would you ask someone to explain beyond the written measurements?